Hey James, can you post more logs. I'm interested to see the logs above what was pasted in the previous email. I think the real reason hides there...
On 9/30/12 8:50 AM, "James Martin" <jmar...@basho.com> wrote: >This was because I did have the nfs service subscribing to >/etc/exports in the puppet recipe. > >I'm back to the same error as before: > > >2012-09-30 10:16:49,695 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl] >(consoleproxy-1:null) VM state transitted from :Starting to Stopped >with event: OperationFailedvm's original host id: null new host id: >null host id before state transition: null >2012-09-30 10:16:49,703 WARN >[cloud.consoleproxy.ConsoleProxyManagerImpl] (consoleproxy-1:null) >Exception while trying to start console proxy >com.cloud.exception.InsufficientServerCapacityException: Unable to >create a deployment for VM[ConsoleProxy|v-2-TEST]Scope=interface >com.cloud.dc.DataCenter; id=1 > at >com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.advanceStart(VirtualMachineManagerI >mpl.java:734) > at >com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.start(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.jav >a:472) > at >com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.start(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.jav >a:465) > at >com.cloud.consoleproxy.ConsoleProxyManagerImpl.startProxy(ConsoleProxyMana >gerImpl.java:624) > at >com.cloud.consoleproxy.ConsoleProxyManagerImpl.allocCapacity(ConsoleProxyM >anagerImpl.java:1154) > at >com.cloud.consoleproxy.ConsoleProxyManagerImpl.expandPool(ConsoleProxyMana >gerImpl.java:1961) > at >com.cloud.consoleproxy.ConsoleProxyManagerImpl.expandPool(ConsoleProxyMana >gerImpl.java:170) > at >com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner.loadScan(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:113) > at >com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner.access$100(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:34) > at >com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner$1.reallyRun(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:83) > at com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner$1.run(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:73) > at >java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:471) > at >java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRunAndReset(FutureTask.java:351) > at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.runAndReset(FutureTask.java:178) > at >java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.acces >s$201(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:165) > at >java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(S >cheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:267) > at >java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java: >1110) > at >java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java >:603) > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:679) >2012-09-30 10:16:49,730 DEBUG [cloud.storage.StorageManagerImpl] >(secstorage-1:null) Expunging Vol[1|vm=1|ROOT] >2012-09-30 10:16:49,742 DEBUG [cloud.storage.StorageManagerImpl] >(secstorage-1:null) Marking volume that was never created as >destroyed: Vol[1|vm=1|ROOT] > > > > > >On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 11:28 AM, James Martin <jmar...@basho.com> wrote: >> My SSVM never starts (or the CPVM for the matter). In the GUI I have >> >> Zones: 1 >> Pods: 1 >> Clusters: 1 >> Hosts : 1 >> Primary Storage : 0 >> Secondary Storage : 1 >> System VMs : 0 >> Virtual Routers : 0 >> >> Also, These messages keep repeating in the logs: >> >> >> 2012-09-30 09:51:01,012 DEBUG [storage.snapshot.SnapshotSchedulerImpl] >> (SnapshotPollTask:null) Snapshot scheduler.poll is being called at >> 2012-09-30 09:51:01 GMT >> 2012-09-30 09:51:01,013 DEBUG [storage.snapshot.SnapshotSchedulerImpl] >> (SnapshotPollTask:null) Got 0 snapshots to be executed at 2012-09-30 >> 09:51:01 GMT >> 2012-09-30 09:51:01,055 DEBUG >> [cloud.network.ExternalLoadBalancerUsageManagerImpl] >> (ExternalNetworkMonitor-1:null) External load balancer devices stats >> collector is running... >> 2012-09-30 09:51:01,106 DEBUG >> [network.router.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl] >> (RouterMonitor-1:null) Found 0 running routers. >> 2012-09-30 09:51:01,120 DEBUG >> [network.router.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl] >> (RouterStatusMonitor-1:null) Found 0 routers. >> 2012-09-30 09:51:15,064 DEBUG [cloud.server.StatsCollector] >> (StatsCollector-1:null) StorageCollector is running... >> 2012-09-30 09:51:15,066 DEBUG [cloud.server.StatsCollector] >> (StatsCollector-1:null) There is no secondary storage VM for secondary >> storage host nfs://10.0.2.15:/opt/storage/secondary >> 2012-09-30 09:51:15,072 DEBUG [cloud.server.StatsCollector] >> (StatsCollector-2:null) VmStatsCollector is running... >> 2012-09-30 09:51:15,943 DEBUG [agent.manager.DirectAgentAttache] >> (DirectAgent-1:null) Ping from 1 >> 2012-09-30 09:51:16,706 DEBUG [cloud.server.StatsCollector] >> (StatsCollector-1:null) HostStatsCollector is running... >> 2012-09-30 09:51:16,714 DEBUG [agent.manager.DirectAgentAttache] >> (DirectAgent-14:null) Seq 1-164560912: Executing request >> 2012-09-30 09:51:16,874 DEBUG [agent.manager.DirectAgentAttache] >> (DirectAgent-14:null) Seq 1-164560912: Response Received: >> 2012-09-30 09:51:16,875 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request] >> (StatsCollector-1:null) Seq 1-164560912: Received: { Ans: , MgmtId: >> 8796761203466, via: 1, Ver: v1, Flags: 10, { GetHostStatsAnswer } } >> 2012-09-30 09:51:18,640 DEBUG [agent.manager.DirectAgentAttache] >> (DirectAgent-31:null) Seq 1-164560898: Executing request >> 2012-09-30 09:51:18,797 DEBUG [agent.manager.DirectAgentAttache] >> (DirectAgent-31:null) Seq 1-164560898: Response Received: >> 2012-09-30 09:51:18,798 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request] >> (DirectAgent-31:null) Seq 1-164560898: Processing: { Ans: , MgmtId: >> 8796761203466, via: 1, Ver: v1, Flags: 10, >> >>[{"ClusterSyncAnswer":{"_clusterId":1,"_newStates":{},"_isExecuted":false >>,"result":true,"wait":0}}] >> } >> 2012-09-30 09:51:30,279 DEBUG >> [storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null) >> Primary storage is not ready, wait until it is ready to launch >> secondary storage vm >> 2012-09-30 09:51:30,279 DEBUG >> [storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null) >> Zone 1 is not ready to launch secondary storage VM yet >> 2012-09-30 09:51:30,568 DEBUG >> [cloud.consoleproxy.ConsoleProxyManagerImpl] (consoleproxy-1:null) >> Skip capacity scan due to there is no Primary Storage UPintenance mode >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> >> James > -- Æ