I think this is the best outcome and compromise. +1
-----Original Message----- From: Edison Su [mailto:edison...@citrix.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 11:38 AM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Cc: cloudstack-us...@incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: Drop OVM in 4.0? Possible, as the OVM code is in its own separate folder, the OVM fix will not impact other code at all. We can have 4.0.x release to fix OVM. > -----Original Message----- > From: Kelcey Damage (BBITS) [mailto:kel...@bbits.ca] > Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 11:28 AM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Cc: cloudstack-us...@incubator.apache.org > Subject: RE: Drop OVM in 4.0? > > Could OVM be made a hot fix post 4.0 release, but not held to the > official 4.1? > > KELCEY DAMAGE > Infrastructure Systems Architect > www.backbonetechnology.com > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > - > -- > kel...@bbits.ca > > address: 55 East 7th Ave, Vancouver, BC, V5T 1M4 > tel: +1 604 713 8560 ext:114 > fax: +1 604 605 0964 > skype: kelcey.damage > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Edison Su [mailto:edison...@citrix.com] > Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 11:26 AM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Cc: cloudstack-us...@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Drop OVM in 4.0? > > Hi All, > Due to the bug http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-16488 and the > license issue(some files related to OVM are removed on 4.0 > branch(https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator- > cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=7f8a1aabbf9b6764780e0c2ad870009c5555c2d4)), > OVM is not supported on 4.0 branch, currently. > It will take a while(maybe one or two weeks to get OVM back to > work), will we wait for OVM before releasing 4.0, or move OVM into 4.1 > release?
