On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Prasanna Santhanam <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 12:00:18PM -0400, John Burwell wrote: >> David, >> >> Why not expose an API that would allow Cobbler, Foreman, Razor, etc >> to call into CloudStack at the appropriate times? The current REST >> API may even be sufficient. Speaking with experience using both >> Cobbler and Foreman, they work better when they are coordinating the >> provisioning activities rather than being embedded into another >> system. It also avoid any licensing issues, and allows customers >> to chose the tools that most appropriately fits their environment. >> > > Yup - Foreman comes to mind since it plays well with puppet too during > post-install. As a seperate appliance per pod would be best, an image > that configures - cobbler/foreman/$your_fav_system as per your > physical infrastructure with the admin's REST api of CloudStack.
Why per pod?
