[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-576?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13509903#comment-13509903
]
Kelceydamage@bbits commented on CLOUDSTACK-576:
-----------------------------------------------
I am in agreement with this, as a content IaaS provider, I would not want
integration to go so far as to cloud or obfuscate the IaaS systems in favor of
PaaS. To me they are 2 distinct and seperate methodologies. I do like PaaS, and
would think it more of an opportunity for an add on system it layer.
Sent from my iPhone
> PaaS Enablement: Composite Application Blueprints
> -------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CLOUDSTACK-576
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-576
> Project: CloudStack
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the
> default.)
> Components: API, AWSAPI
> Reporter: Duncan Johnston-Watt
>
> Given the level of interest in CloudStack as a platform for private, hybrid
> and public cloud one of the gaps is support for composite/multi-tier
> application blueprints comparable to VMware vApp and CloudFormation templates
> without necessarily slavishly following either of them. This is almost
> certainly a new component. One that will leverage/enhance the API/AWSAPI
> components amongst others.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
