Are you serious, you want to run a prod. level env. setup (karaf on the vm with 
500MB RAM) on a vm running on a 2G RAM (does not help even if you increase ram 
or disk) devcloud running on virtualbox/kvm?

Get a real host maybe? DevCloud is limited and a good alternative for (offline 
or infra-deficient) CloudStack development, two levels of cpu/storage 
virtualization and three levels of virtual networking is enough abuse :P

Regards.
________________________________________
From: Charles Moulliard [ch0...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2012 12:06 PM
To: cloudstack-dev
Subject: Re: MEMORY_CONSTRAINT_VIOLATIONMemory limits must satisfy:

The reason why I have tried to deploy CentOS is that I'm not sure that with
the small linux image that we provide(cloudstack)  I can deploy my Apache
karaf runtime (fabric project) which requires JDK 6 and at least 500Mb of
RAM.


On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 7:32 AM, Rohit Yadav <rohit.ya...@citrix.com> wrote:

> Charles, alright you can try to create a light weight linux template using
> damn small linux, gentoo or a configurable archlinux as an instance using
> an ISO. If you want to really use CentOS, you should increase the RAM and
> maybe attach an additional disk via vbox, you may also try a KVM setup with
> your own devcloud image.
>
> That said, DevCloud is a replacement for infrastructure for offline
> development, but I would recommend using a real setup for any serious
> development that is storage, memory and network intensive, esp. if
> deploying advance zone/network.
>
> Regards.
> ________________________________________
> From: Charles Moulliard [ch0...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2012 11:44 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev
> Cc: Marcus Sorensen
> Subject: Re: MEMORY_CONSTRAINT_VIOLATIONMemory limits must satisfy:
>
> Hi Rohit,
>
> I don't want to do something else but I have issues
> (MEMORY_CONSTRAINT_VIOLATIONMemory
> limits must satisfy: ..) when I try to create a new instance in the
> management server of CloudStack using CentOs instead of by default linux
> kernel proposed. I run the project like Sebastien (
> http://sebgoa.blogspot.be/2012/11/testing-cloudstack-41-with-devcloud.html
> ).
> So, is there a workaround ?
>
> Regards,
>
> Charles
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 7:03 AM, Rohit Yadav <rohit.ya...@citrix.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Charles, I'm not sure why you want to do that? I think I may have a way
> to
> > get it work with Ubuntu, just that it failed for a number of reasons and
> > worked perfectly with Wheezy. My view is that Debian has higher a
> security
> > and test standards for their releases. (note: systemvms are also made out
> > of debian), Wheezy should be released around February 2013 (the freeze
> was
> > around June-July 2012, if I recall correctly), like we had the previous
> > releases; Lenny's February 2009 and Squeeze's February 2011.
> >
> > Does it matter what flavour of Linux runs as dom0, as long as the xen
> host
> > works fine and networking is not an issue. Marcus and I talked about kvm
> > during ccc12, I've haven't tried it myself but it's was claimed that it
> > works; yes you can run a devcloud appliance on a KVM host (instead of on
> > VirtualBox), run devcloud (a wheezy based base with xen server) directly
> > over kvm. (Note kvm won't run on virtualbox (no pv, only hvm), what I'm
> > suggesting is that you run KVM over baremetal, a intel-vt/amd-v
> processor.)
> >
> > Regards.
> > ________________________________________
> > From: Charles Moulliard [ch0...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2012 11:11 AM
> > To: cloudstack-dev
> > Cc: Marcus Sorensen
> > Subject: Re: MEMORY_CONSTRAINT_VIOLATIONMemory limits must satisfy:
> >
> > Hi Edison, Anthony, Rohit,
> >
> > The new DevCloud2 image (http://rohityadav.in/logs/devcloud/) runs on
> > Debian - Wheezy (
> > http://people.apache.org/~bhaisaab/cloudstack/devcloud/devcloud2.ova)
> and
> > not anymore like DevCloud1 (
> > http://wiki.cloudstack.org/display/COMM/DevCloud)
> > on Ubuntu (http://download.cloud.com/templates/devcloud/DevCloud.ova).
> >
> > If I understand correctly, you would recommend that we create a new image
> > running in virtualbox using CentOS ? And with qemu or qemu + KVM ?
> >
> > Remark : In my case, the guest OS is MacOs 10.7.5 and DevCloud2 (= Debian
> > Wheezy + Xen4.1) runs in VirtulBox (4.2.4)
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Charles
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 12:45 AM, Edison Su <edison...@citrix.com> wrote:
> >
> > > I think I made a big mistake using Ubuntu xen in devcloud, which gives
> us
> > > a lot of troubles.
> > > I know Marcus is using qemu in devcloud, is it good?
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Charles Moulliard [mailto:ch0...@gmail.com]
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2012 2:09 PM
> > > > To: cloudstack-dev
> > > > Subject: Re: MEMORY_CONSTRAINT_VIOLATIONMemory limits must satisfy:
> > > >
> > > > Any idea on how to upgrade xen on Devcloud (= VB running Devian
> Wheezy
> > > > + Xen 4.1) ?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 7:18 PM, Alex Huang <alex.hu...@citrix.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Ah...Didn't realize you're using devCloud.  Anthony is right in
> > > > > another email.  This is most likely due to a mismatch between the
> > xapi
> > > > > java stub library your deployment is using and the xapi your
> devcloud
> > > is on.
> > > > >
> > > > > --Alex
> > > > >
> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > From: Charles Moulliard [mailto:ch0...@gmail.com]
> > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2012 9:11 AM
> > > > > > To: cloudstack-dev
> > > > > > Subject: Re: MEMORY_CONSTRAINT_VIOLATIONMemory limits must
> > > > satisfy:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Alex,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > There is no /var/log/xensource.log file on the XCP machine
> running
> > > > > > in VirtualBox (= Devcloud2) but those one :
> > > > > > ls -la /var/log
> > > > > > -rw-------  1 root     root        20206 Dec  4 16:58
> > > xcp-networkd.log
> > > > > > -rw-------  1 root     root       113299 Dec  4 17:04
> > > xcp-squeezed.log
> > > > > > -rw-------  1 root     root        27422 Dec  4 16:58 xcp-v6d.log
> > > > > > -rw-------  1 root     root     10351527 Dec  4 17:07
> xcp-xapi.log
> > > > > > drwxr-s---  2 root     adm          4096 Dec  3 08:32 xen
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 6:01 PM, Alex Huang <
> alex.hu...@citrix.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > /var/log/xensource.log
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Charles Moulliard
> > > > > > Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat) Twitter :
> > > > > > @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Charles Moulliard
> > > > Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat) Twitter :
> > > @cmoulliard |
> > > > Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Charles Moulliard
> > Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat)
> > Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Charles Moulliard
> Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat)
> Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com
>



--
Charles Moulliard
Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat)
Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com

Reply via email to