> On Oct. 31, 2012, 11:10 p.m., Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> > Hi Radhika, 
> > 
> > A couple of things:
> > 
> > - In the bug for this, (CLOUDSTACK-390) Chip asked whether there's an 
> > option to provide a locally built version of the System VM. Is this 
> > possible? The patch doesn't address that.
> > - "If you are using a separate NFS server, perform this step." Which step? 
> > I'm unclear which step I should or shouldn't perform. Is this unmounting 
> > the NFS server? 
> > - Does the cloud-install-sys-tmplt script mount NFS for the user? 
> > 
> > Thanks!
> > 
> > Joe
> 
> Radhika PC wrote:
>     Thank you Joe. I will look into his.
> 
> Joe Brockmeier wrote:
>     Any progress on this one?
> 
> Radhika PC wrote:
>     Not yet. Sorry about it. Will come back to it at the earliest.
> 
> Radhika PC wrote:
>     A query:
>     
>     What do you mean by locally-built version ? The one downloaded and is 
> available on the local Web server ?
> 
> Joe Brockmeier wrote:
>     Locally built version means a system VM that's built by the user to 
> replace the default system VM. So, not the one downloaded by default.

Updating it as follows:

Secondary storage must be seeded with a template that is used for CloudStack 
system VMs. Citrix provides you with the necessary binary package of the system 
VM. Alternatively, you can build a System VM template of your own locally. If 
you are using your own template, ensure that you copy the template to your Web 
server, and run the cloud-install-sys-tmplt command.


- Radhika


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/7802/#review12975
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Oct. 31, 2012, 6:36 a.m., Radhika PC wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/7802/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Oct. 31, 2012, 6:36 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for cloudstack, David Nalley, Chip Childers, and Jessica 
> Tomechak.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Added a note that Citrix is providing necessary binary package of the system 
> VM.
> 
> 
> This addresses bug CLOUDSTACK-390.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   docs/en-US/prepare-system-vm-template.xml 5ed78f7 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/7802/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> patch cleanly applies.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Radhika PC
> 
>

Reply via email to