Yup, that's it, thanks. 

That helps clarify the issue, and Trevor should be happy :)

Sent from my iPhone

On Jan 5, 2013, at 6:17 AM, Nitin Mehta <nitin.me...@citrix.com> wrote:

> Hi Kelcey / Trevor  - I think you got confused between 2 apis we have in 
> Cloudstack - restoreVirtualMachine and recoverVirtualMachine.
> restore vm api restores a new volume for the vm keeping the IP address and 
> other attributes intact. This action is available only when the vm is stopped 
> or running state. Whereas recover vm is for recovering the vm and just 
> changes the state of the vm (from destroyed to stopped)  and is available 
> when the vm is in destroyed state.
> 
> But we show actions for only one of them in the UI actions. We should have 
> one for restoreVirtualMachine api as well.
> 
> Thanks,
> -Nitin
> 
> 
> On 05-Jan-2013, at 10:35 AM, Kelceydamage@bbits wrote:
> 
> We discussed this, but RestoreVM is for resurrecting a VM in status 
> 'Destroyed' before its expunged.
> 
> Trevor wants to re-image an existing VM. You could also look it at snapshot 
> rollback. Being able to restore a VM to a previous state.
> 
> Most importantly Trevor needs a solution that does not change or re-assign 
> the VMs IP due to corporate application restrictions.
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> On Jan 4, 2013, at 8:57 PM, Koushik Das 
> <koushik....@citrix.com<mailto:koushik....@citrix.com>> wrote:
> 
> Take a look at restoreVirtualMachine API (com.cloud.api.commands.RestoreVMCmd)
> 
> -Koushik
> 
> From: Trevor Francis [mailto:trevor.fran...@tgrahamcapital.com]
> Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2013 2:08 AM
> To: 
> cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org<mailto:cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org>
> Subject: Restore a VM from template
> 
> Is there a way to restore a VM from a template that was created from the API?
> 
> 
> Trevor Francis
> Partner
> 46 Labs | PeerEdge Cloud Switch (PeCS)
> http://www.46labs.com | http://www.peeredge.net
> 720-214-3643- Voice
> tre...@46labs.com<mailto:tre...@46labs.com>
> 
> Solutions Provider for the Telecom Industry
> 
> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to