Yes, as I explained in CLOUDSTACK-307, the VPN support on SRX is too poor with multiple tenants, and have too many limitation, so we want to drop the support for remote access VPN on SRX, and looking forward for Cisco ASA1000v support instead(which is a big new work).
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 12:55 PM, Chip Childers <[email protected]>wrote: > Sheng, > > When reviewing CLOUDSTACK-307, I noticed that the functional spec page > [1] has a big statement at the top: "(This draft is obsolete, due to > we drop the support for Remote Access VPN on SRX)". > > What does that mean? > > -chip > > > [1] > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Remote+Access+VPN+support+on+SRX >
