Sure Devdeep can provide the details
> -----Original Message----- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2013 1:00 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Support for Intel TXT technology > > On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 3:56 PM, Hari Kannan <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Chip, > > > > I will let Animesh comment on the IP/repo stuff - regarding the other > > 2 topics you raised > > > > - I wouldn't claim code at a "done" level yet - we did develop code > > to a sufficient level to demo, but it would need some more work for > > sure. It hadn't made it as part of any Citrix commercial product > > either - it was developed, showcased but hasn't yet seen the light of > > the day > > Understood... so perhaps there isn't a design document. Perhaps the author > of > the code (not sure who it is) wouldn't mind adding some basic design elements > to the FS wiki page. That will help the community evaluate the inclusion of > the > donated code. > > > - Regarding the XS part, it has been developed/tested only for XS - however, > the feature is not restricted for XS - in other words, unlike the host > updates, > which was meant to be for XS only, this feature eventually must support all > hypervisors (or even baremetal servers) - at this time, it has been developed > for XS only.. > > > > Excellent. I'd like to see that reflected in the design / code as well, but > glad to > hear it was a consideration! > > > Hari > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Chip Childers [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Wednesday, January 9, 2013 12:52 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Support for Intel TXT technology > > > > On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 3:44 PM, David Nalley <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> This came in as I was following up on action item from IRC today. This > feature is something that has already been developed before ACS 4.0 and > processes were formalized and also had been demonstrated in public forms > such as in Intel Developers Forum last Sept but somehow missed getting filed. > Can we consider it as an exception and take it for 4.1. I understand we are > few > days past cutoff, I will ensure we are more diligent in future. > >>> > >>> Animesh > >> > >> > >> Is the code already in the repo? Or was it developed externally? > >> > > > > Good question. My previous email made the assumption that it was not > currently in the project repo, but I could certainly be mistaken. > > > > -chip > >
