On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Chip Childers <[email protected]> wrote: > IMO, no. I want the first issue resolved first (revert the code that > shouldn't be in the repo). Then we can talk about accepting the > donation proposal I assume is coming. > > But this is just my opinion. Anyone else? > > On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Chip >> >> Should we expedite IP clearance process and avoid having to revert commits? >> >> Thanks >> Animesh >>
I don't know that there is a 'expedite' option. Our history thus far is that this doesn't happen rapidly. I think the fastest we can get away with is likely a week - and that's assuming all of the planets align, all paperwork is immediately signed, acknowledged, we have only tailwinds, etc. Given that it is currently the 11th, I'm not even sure that with the volume of problematic features that they'll even be through IP Clearance by code freeze. --David
