Noa Resare created CLOUDSTACK-964:
-------------------------------------
Summary: fix python module naming
Key: CLOUDSTACK-964
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-964
Project: CloudStack
Issue Type: Improvement
Security Level: Public (Anyone can view this level - this is the default.)
Reporter: Noa Resare
Priority: Minor
There are two toplevel python modules that is part of cloudstack, named
'coud_utils' and 'cloudutils' respectively. This seems very much like an
artifact of the development of the project rather than actual design.
I propose we make things a bit more straightforward by putting all modules into
a single namespace with a name easily derived from the project name, such as
'cloudstack', and update import statements accordingly.
So, is this an incompatible change to a published API or not? I would claim it
is not, and the fact that the python modules gets installed into the system
python path by default is just a side effect of people doing packaging not
being up to date on how private python packaging is normally done in Debian.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
