> -----Original Message----- > From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@citrix.com] > Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 6:47 PM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: Build SystemVM template > > > On 17-Jan-2013, at 6:10 PM, Sheng Yang <sh...@yasker.org> wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 5:07 PM, Rohit Yadav <rohit.ya...@citrix.com> > wrote: > >> Hi Sheng, we can reuse viewee and vagrant based appliance building code > for devcloud for systemvm. We can use debian wheezy i386 beta4 for now > and when it releases in february we can have another round of > building/testing. > > > > Sure, is there a document for it? Also, I didn't see a release date > > for Wheezy... Do you have reference? > > tools/devcloud/README.md (it can have bugs, help fix it wherever you see > improvement) Once you build systemvm, you can export and convert the > disk image from vmdk/vhd to qcow2/vhd/vmdk etc.
Xenserver has its own magic for VHD format, not sure you can export virtualbox;s VHD into xenserver's VHD. Maybe Anthony has more experience. BTW, this is what I mean CC used for. > Wheezy should release in Feb like the last two releases in 2009 and 2011, but > it's not confirmed. > > Regards. > > > > > --Sheng > >> > >> Regards. > >> > >> On 17-Jan-2013, at 4:18 PM, Sheng Yang <sh...@yasker.org> wrote: > >> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> I just found the buildsystemvm.sh won't work, and I need to build a > >>> new systemvm template for IPv6 support, because we're adding new > >>> softwares in it. > >>> > >>> Apparently due to license issue(I guess),xt_CHECKSUM.ko which is a > >>> extension of iptables to fix one Debian/Ubuntu DHCP issue. I believe > >>> the iptables_1.4.8-3local1checksum1_i386.deb(a patched version of > >>> iptables by us) is also removed, as well as > >>> xe-guest-utilities_5.6.0-595_i386.deb. > >>> > >>> So, what we suppose to do to make systemvm template buildable again? > >>> I know there are some licenses issues involved, but not quite clear > >>> on these. > >>> > >>> --Sheng > >>