Hi all - thanks for the additional votes. I'm going to shut the vote
down tomorrow morning (my time) and start the IPMC vote barring any
show-stoppers before then. 

Thanks,

Joe

On Sat, Feb 2, 2013, at 02:52 AM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 7:01 PM, Chip Childers
> <chip.child...@sungard.com>wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote:
> > > +1 !
> >
> > Yay mentor vote!  Thanks Jim!
> >
> > Are any of our other mentors members able to spend some time and cast
> > a vote?
> 
> 
> Doing the functional testing to the best of my ability right now.
> 
> However the sources look good with respect to signatures, and checksums.
> Legal aspects look good.
> 
> Rat shows no show stopper issues:
> 
> Summary
> -------
> Notes: 13
> Binaries: 209
> Archives: 0
> Standards: 1116
> 
> Apache Licensed: 1083
> Generated Documents: 0
> 
> JavaDocs are generated and so license header is optional
> Generated files do not required license headers
> 
> 33 Unknown Licenses
> 
> Those 33 seem to be in files that do not need headers, cannot have them
> or
> are generated.
> 
> Couple of not so critical nit picking details (forgive me in advance):
> 
> (1) Might be nice to put sha512 in the sources SHA hash file name so
> people
> know we're using SHA 512. I just tried all hash checksums until the last
> one (sha512) worked.
> (2) It seems as though Joe's j...@zonker.net RSA key A0207CD4 was used to
> sign the sources instead of 05CD14DD?  All worked out when I pulled that
> key down and check the signature.
> 
> gpg apache-cloudstack-4.0.1-incubating-src.tar.bz2.asc gpg: Signature
> made
> Mon 28 Jan 2013 09:30:51 PM EET using RSA key ID A0207CD4
> gpg: Good signature from "Joe Brockmeier (Zonker) <j...@zonker.net>"
> gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
> gpg:          There is no indication that the signature belongs to the
> owner.
> Primary key fingerprint: 7CE4 9725 0BE5 0FC6 9CA7  B190 A6D6 E733 A020
> 7CD4
> 
> I'm still going to continue to kick the tires (functional testing) and
> might report back even after the vote. For the purposes of this vote, the
> sources and legal matters are most important and at this point I can +1
> it:
> 
> +1 (binding)
> 
> Great job guys!
> 
> -- 
> Best Regards,
> -- Alex


Best,

jzb
-- 
Joe Brockmeier
j...@zonker.net
Twitter: @jzb
http://www.dissociatedpress.net/

Reply via email to