As you can see, it doesn't matter for you that the storage refactor branch didn't make it into 4.1, because you wouldn't have had time to get any storage code into cloudstack 4.1 anyway. So it's fine to develop in tandem with Edison's branch, so long as it's far enough along to do so. If he merges it soon, then lots of people will have plenty of time to work against it and get their primary storage into 4.2.
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 10:19 PM, Chip Childers <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 10:10:27PM -0700, Mike Tutkowski wrote: >> OK, thanks...I wasn't sure when feature freeze was. >> >> Do we have a roadmap that might indicate when 4.2 (or whatever it will be >> called) is expected for release? > > I should probaby put this on the wiki, but we've been planning on going > to a 4 month cycle. Here's what we've been working off of: > > 4.1 > Nov through Jan - Feature work > Feb and March - Testing / Hardening / Wrap-up > 4.2 > April and May - Feature work > June and July - Testing / Hardening / Wrap-up > 4.3 > August and September - Feature work > October and November - Testing / Hardening / Wrap-up
