On Feb 8, 2013, at 10:19 PM, David Nalley <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Sebastien Goasguen <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Feb 8, 2013, at 9:58 PM, Chip Childers <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 03:52:25PM -0500, David Nalley wrote: >>>> On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Chip Childers <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> Builds are continuing to fail right now... Due to the check-in of the >>>>> .po files. >>>>> >>>>> The offending issues can be seen in the Rat report here: >>>>> https://builds.apache.org/job/cloudstack-rat-master/744/artifact/target/rat.txt >>>>> >>>>> Do folks think that we should (1) correct them, or (2) exclude them from >>>>> reporting? I'm not familiar enough with their lifecycle to know what >>>>> the right answer is. >>>>> >>>> >>>> They should be corrected IMO. >>>> >>>> --David >>>> >>> >>> Sebastien, >>> >>> As our self appointed "Master of Translation", do you mind doing the >>> honors? >>> >>> -chip >> >> The .pot files are generated automatically by publican. >> >> Sorry I totally missed that they did not have Apache license headers. >> >> You want me to revert the commit ? never done it. >> >> -sebastien >> > > Why not just add the license header to them? > > --David
I will do that, but I don't know what it will do with transifex…when we push ... we will have the same issue with the .po files (there are a few in the runbook branch right now).
