CCing Manan to comment on the requirements.

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Likitha Shetty [mailto:likitha.she...@citrix.com]
>Sent: Friday, February 15, 2013 7:09 PM
>To: cloudstack-us...@incubator.apache.org; cloudstack-
>d...@incubator.apache.org
>Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Dedicated Resources: Public IP Addresses and VLANs per
>Tenant
>
>Hi All,
>
>This is with respect to Part 1 of the feature 'Dedicate Public IP range' which 
>is
>already implemented in CS.
>Following is the observation wrt what is the current CS implementation and the
>proposed changes to the same,
>
>1.       A public VLAN-IP range can only be associated to an account during the
>creation of the range
>Proposed change - Admin should be allowed to dedicate a range even after it
>has been created and also allowed to change the owner
>
>2.       If an admin associates an IP range to an account, all the IP's of 
>that range
>get acquired by a single isolated network in that account
>
>a.       If there are no isolated guest networks, a new network is created and 
>all
>the IP's from the range are dedicated to the new network
>
>b.      If there is 1 isolated guest network, all the IP's from the range are
>dedicated to the existing network
>
>c.       If there are more than 1 isolated guest network CS throws an error
>
>               Proposed change - When an account is chosen, the user also has 
> the
>option to choose the network in the account which can acquire the IP's
>
>3.       When a network that has a dedicated IP range is deleted, the mapping
>between the account that owned the network and IP range persists. This implies
>that the admin sees that the range is associated to the account. But the IP's 
>from
>this range can be acquired by any other account
>
>Proposed change  - The IP range should no longer be owned by the account
>
>4.       When an account is deleted the IP ranges dedicated to that account get
>deleted
>
>Proposed change - The range should be released back to the free pool instead
>
>5.       I see a potential starving scenario where a certain account that has
>dedicated range uses up all the IP's from the free pool as well
>
>Proposed change  - Impose a configurable limit like say, at least one range
>should always belong to the free pool
>
>6.       Even if a range is dedicated to an account, any network that belongs 
>to
>this account including the one that has acquired the IP's can acquire more IP's
>from the free pool. This is because when we dedicate an IP range to an account,
>one of the networks of that account acquires all the IP's.
>
>Proposed change - During dedication we just mark this range of IP's as
>dedicated. And only when the user acquires an IP for a particular network we
>allow the network to choose from the dedicated range. If this change is
>implemented we will not run into issue #2.
>
>Please provide your feedback. I will publish an FS keeping in line with the
>requirements we decide upon.
>
>
>
>Thank you,
>
>Likitha
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Likitha Shetty [mailto:likitha.she...@citrix.com]
>Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 5:11 PM
>To: cloudstack-us...@incubator.apache.org; cloudstack-
>d...@incubator.apache.org
>Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Dedicated Resources: Public IP Addresses and VLANs per
>Tenant
>
>
>
>In CloudStack we can already reserve the public IP range to an account but not
>release it back to the free pool, so how about we divide this requirement into 
>2
>parts - 1) Dedicate Public IP range 2) Dedicate Guest VLAN's per tenant.
>
>
>
>Since Part 1 has already implemented, we need to only add the enhancement
>'Add releasing these IP Address range to the free pool'. I will create an
>enhancement ticket to track this?
>
>As for Part 2, I will soon publish an FS based on the requirements.
>
>
>
>Any concerns?
>
>
>
>Thank you,
>
>Likitha
>
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>
>>From: Likitha Shetty [mailto:likitha.she...@citrix.com]
>
>>Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 3:55 PM
>
>>To: cloudstack-us...@incubator.apache.org; cloudstack-
>
>>d...@incubator.apache.org
>
>>Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Dedicated Resources: Public IP Addresses and
>
>>VLANs per Tenant
>
>>
>
>>Yes, before reserving the public ip range we do verify if the
>
>>account/domain is exceeding the limit.
>
>>
>
>>Thank You,
>
>>Likitha
>
>>
>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>
>>>From: Sailaja Mada [mailto:sailaja.m...@citrix.com]
>
>>>Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 3:50 PM
>
>>>To: cloudstack-us...@incubator.apache.org; cloudstack-
>
>>>d...@incubator.apache.org
>
>>>Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Dedicated Resources: Public IP Addresses and
>
>>>VLANs per Tenant
>
>>>
>
>>>Hi Likitha,
>
>>>
>
>>>Currently we can reserve the public IP range to an account. I would
>
>>>assume we are cross checking the account/domain limit for the max no
>
>>>of Public IP addresses  while reserving the Public IP to an account?
>
>>>
>
>>>Please clarify.
>
>>>
>
>>>Thanks,
>
>>>Sailaja.M
>
>>>
>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>
>>>From: Likitha Shetty [mailto:likitha.she...@citrix.com]
>
>>>Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2013 7:43 PM
>
>>>To: cloudstack-us...@incubator.apache.org; cloudstack-
>
>>>d...@incubator.apache.org
>
>>>Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Dedicated Resources: Public IP Addresses and
>
>>>VLANs per Tenant
>
>>>
>
>>>For CreateVlanIpRange API call, we can set the account parameter to
>
>>>specify the VLAN owner. If specified, the Public IP's get allocated to
>
>>>the account and the VLAN get dedicated to it. Could you please clarify
>
>>>what the difference between this and the mentioned requirement is?
>
>>>
>
>>>But I couldn't figure out a way to release back the VLAN and the
>
>>>allocated IP's to the free pool. I achieved it by deleting the VLAN-IP
>
>>>range and then adding it back to the system account. Is there a better
>
>>>way to do it or do we need to implement this?
>
>>>
>
>>>Thank you,
>
>>>Likitha
>
>>>
>
>>>>-----Original Message-----
>
>>>>From: Manan Shah [mailto:manan.s...@citrix.com]
>
>>>>Sent: Friday, January 04, 2013 10:11 PM
>
>>>>To: cloudstack-us...@incubator.apache.org
>
>>>>Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Dedicated Resources: Public IP Addresses and
>
>>>>VLANs per Tenant
>
>>>>
>
>>>>Thanks Tamas for bringing up additional requirements. I have updated
>
>>>>the requirements document.
>
>>>>
>
>>>>Regards,
>
>>>>Manan Shah
>
>>>>
>
>>>>
>
>>>>
>
>>>>
>
>>>>On 1/4/13 6:32 AM, "Tamas Monos"
><tam...@veber.co.uk<mailto:tam...@veber.co.uk>> wrote:
>
>>>>
>
>>>>>+1
>
>>>>>
>
>>>>>Additional to the requirements:
>
>>>>>- Usage must reflect if these are assigned to an Account so the
>
>>>>>admin can see how many IP is allocated to the account.
>
>>>>>- On allocation it needs to check whether the required range is
>
>>>>>available (not in use) and conforms with the account limits (cannot
>
>>>>>allocate more IPs than maximum IPs per account).
>
>>>>>
>
>>>>>Regards
>
>>>>>
>
>>>>>Tamas Monos                                               DDI
>
>>>>>+44(0)2034687012
>
>>>>>Chief Technical                                             Office
>
>>>>>+44(0)2034687000
>
>>>>>Veber: The Hosting Specialists               Fax         +44(0)871 522
>
>>>>>7057
>
>>>>>http://www.veber.co.uk
>
>>>>>
>
>>>>>Follow us on Twitter:
>www.twitter.com/veberhost<http://www.twitter.com/veberhost> Follow us on
>Facebook:
>
>>>>>www.facebook.com/veberhost<http://www.facebook.com/veberhost>
>
>>>>>
>
>>>>>
>
>>>>>-----Original Message-----
>
>>>>>From: Manan Shah [mailto:manan.s...@citrix.com]
>
>>>>>Sent: 22 December 2012 01:03
>
>>>>>To: cloudstack-us...@incubator.apache.org
>
>>>>>Subject: [DISCUSS] Dedicated Resources: Public IP Addresses and
>
>>>>>VLANs per Tenant
>
>>>>>
>
>>>>>Hi,
>
>>>>>
>
>>>>>I would like to propose a new feature for dedicating IP Addresses
>
>>>>>and VLANs per Tenant. I have created a JIRA ticket and provided the
>
>>>>>requirements at the following location.  Please provide feedback on
>
>>>>>the requirements.
>
>>>>>
>
>>>>>JIRA Ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-704
>
>>>>>Requirements:
>
>>>>>https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Dedicated+Res
>
>>>>>o
>
>>>>>u
>
>>>>>r
>
>>>>>ces
>
>>>>>+
>
>>>>>-+Public+IP+Addresses+and+VLANs+per+Tenant
>
>>>>>
>
>>>>>Regards,
>
>>>>>Manan Shah
>
>>>>>
>
>>>>>
>
>>>>>
>

Reply via email to