On Mar 8, 2013, at 3:51 PM, David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 3:47 PM, Chip Childers <chip.child...@sungard.com> > wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 02:30:27PM -0500, Chip Childers wrote: >>> Well, if we want it someone needs to do it. I'm looking at hadoop (as >>> David suggested) [snip...] >> >> Take a look at Hadoop's contributor guide [1], specifically the >> "Contributing your work" section. Hadoop is using Jira for patch >> submissions, a custom jira workflow, and builds.a.o basically does the >> CI +1 of the patch before a committer reviews and commits it. >> >> They basically have the workflow that I proposed... The downside is >> that Jira attachments are a poor way to do peer reviews. >> >> Thoughts? > > > I thought that was supposed to be the piece that Gerrit solved. > > --David >
I said "workflow" not tool chain. The point was that they have a similar process, and a different use of tools to pull it off (than what we are discussing).
