Hi Murali Many thanks for your answers.
>Can I ask what is the kind of deployment you are looking for? Do you intend to >provide LB as a service to the tenants (users)? If not, and want fully >leverage Haproxy or NetScaler's load balancing >functionality then IMO, you >can restrict CS router appliance to provide just DNS and DHCP services, and >setup data path through gateway and load balancer devices that you can >control. Yes we like to deploy a LB service per tenant. Dreaming of something where CS is creating the service and real servers entries in the LB and then the tenant can connect to the LB and do all the fancy things the LB supports. So if we create a Network Offering with NetScaler as LB provider, will CS create virt and real servers on the NetScaler and we can adapt then the settings on the NetScaler to our needs or is this also stateless and the config may get lost? So if I'm reading this: http://blogs.citrix.com/2012/02/14/cloudstack-3-0-netscaler-driving-application-networking-in-cloud/ I have many more questions: - what's the advantage disadvantage of parallel vs. in-line mode - how are those modes configured, don't see where to configure If all this won't help, do we have to create a shared network offering without LoadBalancer feature and deploy the LB service ourselves? Regards Andi
