On Fri, 2003-01-24 at 21:53, Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > agreed, there's nothing wrong w/choosing GNOME and putting effort into making > it look good... on the other hand, i don't think how they've packaged KDE is > a positive thing in the least.
I'm not quite clear on exactly what they did with KDE. I have read RedHat's explanation and I have seen it in action. It looks like purely cosmetic changes to me. But they made the same cosmetic changes to Gnome (Bluecurve, Mozilla instead of Galeon, real stupid menu system, etc.). Is there something that I'm missing here? I know when I put RedHat on my system my girlfriend was real pissed off. She wanted KDE back (at least the way it was in Mandrake). I changed the themes, background, mouse click from double to single, etc. and setup kmail as the default mail program and konqueror and the default browser. What I'm trying to say is I can see how these changes piss people off, but they're nothing that can't be changed in a few minutes. Jesse
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
