-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I use pfsense, ipcop, and vanilla debian/ubuntu boxes in various roles
as firewalls, routers, bridges, proxies etc.  Which one I choose depends
entirely on the specifics of a given project.

I really like pfsense for the automatic failover and site to site VPNs.
I use Ipcop in cases where tight proxy control is desired, and vanilla
linux boxes for routers, bridges, crazy solutions.  I prefer Linux for
custom jobs involving routing, traffic shaping, firewall as I really
know and like tc, ip, netfilter.

In this case pfsense makes a lot of sense, as does ipcop/smoothwall.  It
will likely come down to how comfortable you feel in supporting it when
things go bad.

There are a couple of people on this list who can help you if required.

Johnny Stork wrote:
> I have a client that is planning to install/use the pfsense firewall on 
> a smal mini itx system they setup with dual NICs. I am currently 
> downloading the live cd to check it out but I am a bit concerned since I 
> never heard of it, the current release appears to be in beta and I am 
> wondering about the apparently small user base. I have run/evaluated 
> many firewalls such as ClarkConnect, Smoothwall, Ipcop, Shoreline, 
> Astaro etc (my favorite is Astaro), so does anyone have any suggestions, 
> experiences/feedback with pfsense etc?
> 
> Beyond the basic requirements of any firewall for DMZ, NAT, IDS etc, 
> they absolutely need to have a reliable VPN to connect 2 identically 
> configured miniitx machines running the software, between Canada and Europe.
> 
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFHR3qJwRXgH3rKGfMRAqGcAJ0a6e0qNFHs6bdb5Ee06YHhj4CysgCfdjHQ
AFaF8u/5dwRmwkFGV2rkxr0=
=DzRO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
clug-talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://clug.ca/mailman/listinfo/clug-talk_clug.ca
Mailing List Guidelines (http://clug.ca/ml_guidelines.php)
**Please remove these lines when replying

Reply via email to