Frank Filz wrote:
I assume the intent here with this implementation is that the node taking over will start lock recovery for the ip address? With that perspective, I guess it would be important that each file system only be accessed with a single ip address otherwise lock recovery will not work correctly since another node/ip could accept locks for that filesystem, possibly "stealing" a lock that is in recovery. As I recall, our implementation put the entire filesystem cluster-wide into recovery during fail-over.
We have 2 more patches on their way to this mailing that: * Set per-ip based grace period * Notify only relevant clients about reclaim events -- Wendy
