Hi,

On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 06:50 +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> similar to 326f6a5c9c9e1a62aec37bdc0c3f8d53adabe77b,
> only writable by root but worth fixing.
> 
> Signed-off-by: maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
>  fs/gfs2/locking.c |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/gfs2/locking.c b/fs/gfs2/locking.c
> index 663fee7..4857024 100644
> --- a/fs/gfs2/locking.c
> +++ b/fs/gfs2/locking.c
> @@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ retry:
>               if (!try && capable(CAP_SYS_MODULE)) {
>                       try = 1;
>                       mutex_unlock(&lmh_lock);
> -                     request_module(proto_name);
> +                     request_module("%s", proto_name);
>                       goto retry;
>               }
>               printk(KERN_INFO "GFS2: can't find protocol %s\n", proto_name);

I'm not quite sure whats wrong with the original here, but I'm currently
working upon a patch to remove the lock_dlm module (the lock_nolock
module is already gone) by merging it into the core of GFS2. So that
this module loading code will be disappearing very shortly.

So on that basis, I don't feel that its worth applying this patch at the
moment anyway,

Steve.


Reply via email to