Hi, On Fri, 2009-10-09 at 12:20 -0400, Jason Baron wrote: > On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 05:05:19PM +0100, Steven Whitehouse wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Fri, 2009-10-09 at 12:01 -0400, Jason Baron wrote: > > > hi, > > > > > > I'd like to move the gfs2 tracepoints to the the common > > > include/trace/events directory along with all of the other trace events. > > > It makes understanding what tracepoints are available easier, and I see > > > no reason why gfs2 should be different. For example, 'ext4.h' is already > > > in the include/trace/events directory. > > > > > > thanks, > > > > > > -Jason > > > > > I've no objection to that, it sounds like a good plan. Should I stick > > this in the GFS2 tree, or would you rather keep it in the trace tree? I > > was thinking probably the GFS2 tree would be better as it reduces the > > chances of any future conflicts. > > gfs2 tree works for me. > > thanks, > > -Jason > Ok, done. Should be appearing shortly. Thanks,
Steve.
