On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 11:07:27PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> ...save 3 bytes of stack space.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlay...@redhat.com>

ACK.--b.

> ---
>  fs/locks.c |    9 +++++----
>  1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/locks.c b/fs/locks.c
> index a7d2253..cef0e04 100644
> --- a/fs/locks.c
> +++ b/fs/locks.c
> @@ -800,7 +800,8 @@ static int __posix_lock_file(struct inode *inode, struct 
> file_lock *request, str
>       struct file_lock *left = NULL;
>       struct file_lock *right = NULL;
>       struct file_lock **before;
> -     int error, added = 0;
> +     int error;
> +     bool added = false;
>  
>       /*
>        * We may need two file_lock structures for this operation,
> @@ -894,7 +895,7 @@ static int __posix_lock_file(struct inode *inode, struct 
> file_lock *request, str
>                               continue;
>                       }
>                       request = fl;
> -                     added = 1;
> +                     added = true;
>               }
>               else {
>                       /* Processing for different lock types is a bit
> @@ -905,7 +906,7 @@ static int __posix_lock_file(struct inode *inode, struct 
> file_lock *request, str
>                       if (fl->fl_start > request->fl_end)
>                               break;
>                       if (request->fl_type == F_UNLCK)
> -                             added = 1;
> +                             added = true;
>                       if (fl->fl_start < request->fl_start)
>                               left = fl;
>                       /* If the next lock in the list has a higher end
> @@ -935,7 +936,7 @@ static int __posix_lock_file(struct inode *inode, struct 
> file_lock *request, str
>                               locks_release_private(fl);
>                               locks_copy_private(fl, request);
>                               request = fl;
> -                             added = 1;
> +                             added = true;
>                       }
>               }
>               /* Go on to next lock.
> -- 
> 1.7.1
> 

Reply via email to