Hi,
Will glibc do the fallback path, or just return this as an error? I
think thats worth checking as it would be nice it it would transparently
fall back in this case,
Steve.
On 03/06/15 22:30, Abhi Das wrote:
We cannot provide an efficient implementation due to the headers
on the data blocks, so there doesn't seem much point in having it.
Resolves: rhbz#1221331
Signed-off-by: Abhi Das <a...@redhat.com>
---
fs/gfs2/file.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/gfs2/file.c b/fs/gfs2/file.c
index c706c6d..8252115 100644
--- a/fs/gfs2/file.c
+++ b/fs/gfs2/file.c
@@ -917,7 +917,7 @@ static long gfs2_fallocate(struct file *file, int mode,
loff_t offset, loff_t le
struct gfs2_holder gh;
int ret;
- if (mode & ~FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE)
+ if ((mode & ~FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE) || gfs2_is_jdata(ip))
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
mutex_lock(&inode->i_mutex);
