On Wed, 2017-07-26 at 12:13 -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 01:55:36PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > +int file_write_and_wait(struct file *file)
> > +{
> > + int err = 0, err2;
> > + struct address_space *mapping = file->f_mapping;
> > +
> > + if ((!dax_mapping(mapping) && mapping->nrpages) ||
> > + (dax_mapping(mapping) && mapping->nrexceptional)) {
>
> Since patch 1 exists, shouldn't this use the new helper?
>
<facepalm>
yes, will fix
> > + err = filemap_fdatawrite(mapping);
> > + /* See comment of filemap_write_and_wait() */
> > + if (err != -EIO) {
> > + loff_t i_size = i_size_read(mapping->host);
> > +
> > + if (i_size != 0)
> > + __filemap_fdatawait_range(mapping, 0,
> > + i_size - 1);
> > + }
> > + }
> > + err2 = file_check_and_advance_wb_err(file);
> > + if (!err)
> > + err = err2;
> > + return err;
>
> Would this be clearer written as:
>
> if (err)
> return err;
> return err2;
>
> or even ...
>
> return err ? err : err2;
>
Meh -- I like it the way I have it. If we don't have an error already,
then just take the one from the check and advance.
That said, I don't have a terribly strong preference here, so if anyone
does, then I can be easily persuaded.
--
--
Jeff Layton <jlay...@redhat.com>
