Hi, ----- Original Message ----- > + ret = __gfs2_trans_begin(sdp, 0, revokes, GFP_NOFS | __GFP_NOFAIL);
The addition of __GFP_NOFAIL means that this operation can now block. Looking at the code, I don't think it will be a problem because it can already block in the log_flush operations that precede it, but it makes me nervous. Obviously, we need to test this really well. Bob
