On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 11:41:03AM -0500, Bob Peterson wrote: > On 7/27/21 2:05 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 01:50:11PM -0500, Bob Peterson wrote: >>> FYI: I just pushed a replacement patch to linux-gfs2/for-next.next4. >>> The patch I mentioned last time had problems, so this is a simplified >>> middle-ground between that patch and the one I suggested earlier. >>> Patch is a89a427e0afe. >> >> With just that patch cherry picked the test still hangs. >> >> The entire linux-gfs2/for-next.next4 completes a quick group xfstests >> run, but with a lot of failures: >> >> Failures: generic/079 generic/082 generic/092 generic/094 generic/103 >> generic/219 generic/230 generic/235 generic/244 generic/294 generic/306 >> generic/347 generic/379 generic/380 generic/382 generic/383 generic/384 >> generic/385 generic/386 generic/400 generic/441 generic/452 generic/488 >> generic/545 generic/566 generic/587 generic/594 generic/600 generic/601 >> generic/603 >> Failed 30 of 514 tests >> > Hi Christoph, > > Can you please pull my latest linux-gfs2/for-next.next4 branch and try your > full run again? I added a patch to not treat the usrquota / grpquota / > prjquota mount options as errors, and I added a new patch from Andreas for > generic/079 and it all seems to work okay for me > (although I haven't done a full run yet). TIA.
Failures: generic/082 generic/092 generic/094 generic/103 generic/219 generic/230 generic/235 generic/294 generic/306 generic/347 generic/371 generic/382 generic/441 generic/452 generic/488 generic/545 generic/566 generic/587 generic/600 generic/601 Failed 20 of 514 tests
