This patch will adds #ifndef __CHECKER__ for false positives warnings about an imbalance lock/unlock srcu handling. Which are shown by running sparse checks:
fs/dlm/midcomms.c:1065:20: warning: context imbalance in 'dlm_midcomms_get_mhandle' - wrong count at exit Using __CHECKER__ will tell sparse to ignore these sections. Those imbalances are false positive because from upper layer it is always required to call a function in sequence, e.g. if dlm_midcomms_get_mhandle() is successful there must be a dlm_midcomms_commit_mhandle() call afterwards. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahri...@redhat.com> --- fs/dlm/lowcomms.c | 10 ++++++++++ fs/dlm/midcomms.c | 10 ++++++++++ 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+) diff --git a/fs/dlm/lowcomms.c b/fs/dlm/lowcomms.c index e284d696c1fd..d01d9ee871b0 100644 --- a/fs/dlm/lowcomms.c +++ b/fs/dlm/lowcomms.c @@ -1303,6 +1303,10 @@ static struct dlm_msg *dlm_lowcomms_new_msg_con(struct connection *con, int len, return msg; } +/* avoid false positive for nodes_srcu, unlock happens in + * dlm_lowcomms_commit_msg which is a must call if success + */ +#ifndef __CHECKER__ struct dlm_msg *dlm_lowcomms_new_msg(int nodeid, int len, gfp_t allocation, char **ppc, void (*cb)(void *data), void *data) @@ -1336,6 +1340,7 @@ struct dlm_msg *dlm_lowcomms_new_msg(int nodeid, int len, gfp_t allocation, msg->idx = idx; return msg; } +#endif static void _dlm_lowcomms_commit_msg(struct dlm_msg *msg) { @@ -1362,11 +1367,16 @@ static void _dlm_lowcomms_commit_msg(struct dlm_msg *msg) return; } +/* avoid false positive for nodes_srcu, lock was happen in + * dlm_lowcomms_new_msg + */ +#ifndef __CHECKER__ void dlm_lowcomms_commit_msg(struct dlm_msg *msg) { _dlm_lowcomms_commit_msg(msg); srcu_read_unlock(&connections_srcu, msg->idx); } +#endif void dlm_lowcomms_put_msg(struct dlm_msg *msg) { diff --git a/fs/dlm/midcomms.c b/fs/dlm/midcomms.c index 3635e42b0669..f95f6f40c404 100644 --- a/fs/dlm/midcomms.c +++ b/fs/dlm/midcomms.c @@ -1062,6 +1062,10 @@ static struct dlm_msg *dlm_midcomms_get_msg_3_2(struct dlm_mhandle *mh, int node return msg; } +/* avoid false positive for nodes_srcu, unlock happens in + * dlm_midcomms_commit_mhandle which is a must call if success + */ +#ifndef __CHECKER__ struct dlm_mhandle *dlm_midcomms_get_mhandle(int nodeid, int len, gfp_t allocation, char **ppc) { @@ -1127,6 +1131,7 @@ struct dlm_mhandle *dlm_midcomms_get_mhandle(int nodeid, int len, srcu_read_unlock(&nodes_srcu, idx); return NULL; } +#endif static void dlm_midcomms_commit_msg_3_2(struct dlm_mhandle *mh) { @@ -1136,6 +1141,10 @@ static void dlm_midcomms_commit_msg_3_2(struct dlm_mhandle *mh) dlm_lowcomms_commit_msg(mh->msg); } +/* avoid false positive for nodes_srcu, lock was happen in + * dlm_midcomms_get_mhandle + */ +#ifndef __CHECKER__ void dlm_midcomms_commit_mhandle(struct dlm_mhandle *mh) { switch (mh->node->version) { @@ -1157,6 +1166,7 @@ void dlm_midcomms_commit_mhandle(struct dlm_mhandle *mh) break; } } +#endif int dlm_midcomms_start(void) { -- 2.31.1