This patch will adds #ifndef __CHECKER__ for false positives warnings
about an imbalance lock/unlock srcu handling. Which are shown by running
sparse checks:
fs/dlm/midcomms.c:1065:20: warning: context imbalance in
'dlm_midcomms_get_mhandle' - wrong count at exit
Using __CHECKER__ will tell sparse to ignore these sections.
Those imbalances are false positive because from upper layer it is
always required to call a function in sequence, e.g. if
dlm_midcomms_get_mhandle() is successful there must be a
dlm_midcomms_commit_mhandle() call afterwards.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahri...@redhat.com>
---
fs/dlm/lowcomms.c | 10 ++++++++++
fs/dlm/midcomms.c | 10 ++++++++++
2 files changed, 20 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/dlm/lowcomms.c b/fs/dlm/lowcomms.c
index e284d696c1fd..d01d9ee871b0 100644
--- a/fs/dlm/lowcomms.c
+++ b/fs/dlm/lowcomms.c
@@ -1303,6 +1303,10 @@ static struct dlm_msg *dlm_lowcomms_new_msg_con(struct
connection *con, int len,
return msg;
}
+/* avoid false positive for nodes_srcu, unlock happens in
+ * dlm_lowcomms_commit_msg which is a must call if success
+ */
+#ifndef __CHECKER__
struct dlm_msg *dlm_lowcomms_new_msg(int nodeid, int len, gfp_t allocation,
char **ppc, void (*cb)(void *data),
void *data)
@@ -1336,6 +1340,7 @@ struct dlm_msg *dlm_lowcomms_new_msg(int nodeid, int len,
gfp_t allocation,
msg->idx = idx;
return msg;
}
+#endif
static void _dlm_lowcomms_commit_msg(struct dlm_msg *msg)
{
@@ -1362,11 +1367,16 @@ static void _dlm_lowcomms_commit_msg(struct dlm_msg
*msg)
return;
}
+/* avoid false positive for nodes_srcu, lock was happen in
+ * dlm_lowcomms_new_msg
+ */
+#ifndef __CHECKER__
void dlm_lowcomms_commit_msg(struct dlm_msg *msg)
{
_dlm_lowcomms_commit_msg(msg);
srcu_read_unlock(&connections_srcu, msg->idx);
}
+#endif
void dlm_lowcomms_put_msg(struct dlm_msg *msg)
{
diff --git a/fs/dlm/midcomms.c b/fs/dlm/midcomms.c
index 3635e42b0669..f95f6f40c404 100644
--- a/fs/dlm/midcomms.c
+++ b/fs/dlm/midcomms.c
@@ -1062,6 +1062,10 @@ static struct dlm_msg *dlm_midcomms_get_msg_3_2(struct
dlm_mhandle *mh, int node
return msg;
}
+/* avoid false positive for nodes_srcu, unlock happens in
+ * dlm_midcomms_commit_mhandle which is a must call if success
+ */
+#ifndef __CHECKER__
struct dlm_mhandle *dlm_midcomms_get_mhandle(int nodeid, int len,
gfp_t allocation, char **ppc)
{
@@ -1127,6 +1131,7 @@ struct dlm_mhandle *dlm_midcomms_get_mhandle(int nodeid,
int len,
srcu_read_unlock(&nodes_srcu, idx);
return NULL;
}
+#endif
static void dlm_midcomms_commit_msg_3_2(struct dlm_mhandle *mh)
{
@@ -1136,6 +1141,10 @@ static void dlm_midcomms_commit_msg_3_2(struct
dlm_mhandle *mh)
dlm_lowcomms_commit_msg(mh->msg);
}
+/* avoid false positive for nodes_srcu, lock was happen in
+ * dlm_midcomms_get_mhandle
+ */
+#ifndef __CHECKER__
void dlm_midcomms_commit_mhandle(struct dlm_mhandle *mh)
{
switch (mh->node->version) {
@@ -1157,6 +1166,7 @@ void dlm_midcomms_commit_mhandle(struct dlm_mhandle *mh)
break;
}
}
+#endif
int dlm_midcomms_start(void)
{
--
2.31.1
