Commit bcfad4265ced ("dlm: improve plock logging if interrupted") shall
improve the printout to give the user a reason why a dlm plock op
function was not found anymore when the kernel dlm op side was sending a
operation request to the user space.

However this situation was still confusing users about those messages. A
new approach will avoid such message and if they occur there is a bug.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahri...@redhat.com>
---
 fs/dlm/plock.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/dlm/plock.c b/fs/dlm/plock.c
index 7cab5d27132b..32eda1f43d22 100644
--- a/fs/dlm/plock.c
+++ b/fs/dlm/plock.c
@@ -443,7 +443,7 @@ static ssize_t dev_write(struct file *file, const char 
__user *u, size_t count,
                else
                        wake_up(&recv_wq);
        } else
-               log_print("%s: no op %x %llx - may got interrupted?", __func__,
+               log_print("%s: no op %x %llx", __func__,
                          info.fsid, (unsigned long long)info.number);
        return count;
 }
-- 
2.31.1

Reply via email to