There are several times of using hard-coded function names inside the
format string. When changing code checkpatch will drop a warning about
this. This patch prepares to not dropping a checkpatch warning when
introduce the same log message for a different loglevel by using
__func__ instead of a hard-coded function name.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahri...@redhat.com>
---
 fs/dlm/lock.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/dlm/lock.c b/fs/dlm/lock.c
index 16d339d383cd..026c203ff529 100644
--- a/fs/dlm/lock.c
+++ b/fs/dlm/lock.c
@@ -2901,7 +2901,7 @@ static int validate_lock_args(struct dlm_ls *ls, struct 
dlm_lkb *lkb,
        rv = 0;
  out:
        if (rv)
-               log_debug(ls, "validate_lock_args %d %x %x %x %d %d %s",
+               log_debug(ls, "%s %d %x %x %x %d %d %s", __func__,
                          rv, lkb->lkb_id, lkb->lkb_flags, args->flags,
                          lkb->lkb_status, lkb->lkb_wait_type,
                          lkb->lkb_resource->res_name);
@@ -3038,7 +3038,7 @@ static int validate_unlock_args(struct dlm_lkb *lkb, 
struct dlm_args *args)
        rv = 0;
  out:
        if (rv)
-               log_debug(ls, "validate_unlock_args %d %x %x %x %x %d %s", rv,
+               log_debug(ls, "%s %d %x %x %x %x %d %s", __func__, rv,
                          lkb->lkb_id, lkb->lkb_flags, lkb->lkb_exflags,
                          args->flags, lkb->lkb_wait_type,
                          lkb->lkb_resource->res_name);
-- 
2.31.1

Reply via email to