On Wed 31-08-22 15:21:04, Zhang Yi wrote:
> ll_rw_block() is not safe for the sync read path because it cannot
> guarantee that submitting read IO if the buffer has been locked. We
> could get false positive EIO after wait_on_buffer() if the buffer has
> been locked by others. So stop using ll_rw_block() in
> ntfs_get_block_vbo().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zh...@huawei.com>

Looks good to me. Feel free to add:

Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <j...@suse.cz>

                                                                Honza

> ---
>  fs/ntfs3/inode.c | 7 ++-----
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ntfs3/inode.c b/fs/ntfs3/inode.c
> index 51363d4e8636..bbe7d4ea1750 100644
> --- a/fs/ntfs3/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/ntfs3/inode.c
> @@ -630,12 +630,9 @@ static noinline int ntfs_get_block_vbo(struct inode 
> *inode, u64 vbo,
>                       bh->b_size = block_size;
>                       off = vbo & (PAGE_SIZE - 1);
>                       set_bh_page(bh, page, off);
> -                     ll_rw_block(REQ_OP_READ, 1, &bh);
> -                     wait_on_buffer(bh);
> -                     if (!buffer_uptodate(bh)) {
> -                             err = -EIO;
> +                     err = bh_read(bh, 0);
> +                     if (err)
>                               goto out;
> -                     }
>                       zero_user_segment(page, off + voff, off + block_size);
>               }
>       }
> -- 
> 2.31.1
> 
-- 
Jan Kara <j...@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR

Reply via email to