There is an API difference between log_print() and other printk()s to
put a newline or not. This one was introduced by mistake because
log_print() adds a newline.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahri...@redhat.com>
---
 fs/dlm/midcomms.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/dlm/midcomms.c b/fs/dlm/midcomms.c
index 3932c7cf0e7a..b5720042ef9d 100644
--- a/fs/dlm/midcomms.c
+++ b/fs/dlm/midcomms.c
@@ -467,7 +467,7 @@ static void dlm_pas_fin_ack_rcv(struct midcomms_node *node)
                break;
        default:
                spin_unlock(&node->state_lock);
-               log_print("%s: unexpected state: %d\n",
+               log_print("%s: unexpected state: %d",
                          __func__, node->state);
                WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
                return;
@@ -540,7 +540,7 @@ static void dlm_midcomms_receive_buffer(union dlm_packet *p,
                                break;
                        default:
                                spin_unlock(&node->state_lock);
-                               log_print("%s: unexpected state: %d\n",
+                               log_print("%s: unexpected state: %d",
                                          __func__, node->state);
                                WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
                                return;
@@ -1269,7 +1269,7 @@ static void dlm_act_fin_ack_rcv(struct midcomms_node 
*node)
                break;
        default:
                spin_unlock(&node->state_lock);
-               log_print("%s: unexpected state: %d\n",
+               log_print("%s: unexpected state: %d",
                          __func__, node->state);
                WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
                return;
@@ -1369,7 +1369,7 @@ void dlm_midcomms_remove_member(int nodeid)
                        /* already gone, do nothing */
                        break;
                default:
-                       log_print("%s: unexpected state: %d\n",
+                       log_print("%s: unexpected state: %d",
                                  __func__, node->state);
                        break;
                }
-- 
2.31.1

Reply via email to