The ls parameter in write_result() is not used, so we can remove it.
---
 dlm_controld/plock.c | 13 ++++++-------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/dlm_controld/plock.c b/dlm_controld/plock.c
index c2c80360..462c9212 100644
--- a/dlm_controld/plock.c
+++ b/dlm_controld/plock.c
@@ -684,8 +684,7 @@ static int add_waiter(struct lockspace *ls, struct resource 
*r,
        return 0;
 }
 
-static void write_result(struct lockspace *ls, struct dlm_plock_info *in,
-                        int rv)
+static void write_result(struct dlm_plock_info *in, int rv)
 {
        int write_rv;
 
@@ -719,7 +718,7 @@ static void do_waiters(struct lockspace *ls, struct 
resource *r)
                rv = lock_internal(ls, r, in);
 
                if (in->nodeid == our_nodeid)
-                       write_result(ls, in, rv);
+                       write_result(in, rv);
 
                free(w);
        }
@@ -744,7 +743,7 @@ static void do_lock(struct lockspace *ls, struct 
dlm_plock_info *in,
 
  out:
        if (in->nodeid == our_nodeid && rv != -EINPROGRESS)
-               write_result(ls, in, rv);
+               write_result(in, rv);
 
        do_waiters(ls, r);
        put_resource(ls, r);
@@ -768,7 +767,7 @@ static void do_unlock(struct lockspace *ls, struct 
dlm_plock_info *in,
        }
 
        if (in->nodeid == our_nodeid)
-               write_result(ls, in, rv);
+               write_result(in, rv);
 
  skip_result:
        do_waiters(ls, r);
@@ -787,7 +786,7 @@ static void do_get(struct lockspace *ls, struct 
dlm_plock_info *in,
        else
                rv = 0;
 
-       write_result(ls, in, rv);
+       write_result(in, rv);
        put_resource(ls, r);
 }
 
@@ -830,7 +829,7 @@ static void __receive_plock(struct lockspace *ls, struct 
dlm_plock_info *in,
                log_elock(ls, "receive_plock error from %d optype %d",
                          from, in->optype);
                if (from == our_nodeid)
-                       write_result(ls, in, -EINVAL);
+                       write_result(in, -EINVAL);
        }
 }
 
-- 
2.31.1

Reply via email to