On Sun, 2008-12-14 at 13:29 +0100, Giacomo Graziosi wrote: > 2008/12/14 Murray Cumming <[email protected]>: > > On Sat, 2008-12-13 at 22:23 +0100, Giacomo Graziosi wrote: > > > > There are plenty of cluttermm tarball releases. Sorry, I don't have > > access to that clutter.org page, and we don't but we at least mention > > the links in our announcements, such as: > > http://lists.o-hand.com/clutter/1420.html > > That is a 0.7 while clutter is on 0.8 version.
cluttermm wraps 0.8. We just don't want to call it cluttermm 0.8 because that would imply that we have declared the API/ABI to be stable. I think the C++ bindings are quite up to date. > Looks like the most updated and supported bindings are the ones for > python, am I wrong? > Do you know of any project using rbclutter? -- Murray Cumming [email protected] www.murrayc.com www.openismus.com -- To unsubscribe send a mail to [email protected]
