On Wed, 2008-12-24 at 15:44 +0530, varun shrivastava wrote: > hi > I was trying to use tidy adjustment which has ClutterFixed as > members. > So if try to modify the adjustment value > 32767, it overflows. > When i checked ClutterFixed implementation its a 16.16. > > So is there a design issue for making ClutterFixed as a gint32 > (16.16)?
GLES uses a 16.16 fixed point notation in the public API, to which we have to conform. > Can 't it be made gint64(32.32)? > Will it give a performance hit? on ARMs, it's quite possible. we are currently re-evaluating part of the decisions we made with regards to fixed points and units, but that is all 1.x material. ciao, Emmanuele. -- Emmanuele Bassi, Intel Open Source Technology Center -- To unsubscribe send a mail to [email protected]
