On Wednesday 13 October 2010, Alexander Neundorf wrote: > On Wednesday 13 October 2010, Bill Hoffman wrote: > > So, I think we have to use the new name approach. Do we want to call it > > 2? Or should we call it something else? > > > > Alex, do you have time to do this? > > I think it's not a good solution, and the one with CURRENT_LIST_DIR is > definitely better and already implemented. > And I am still convinced that I am right here, see my other mails.
So I would suggest to merge the CURRENT_LIST_DIR branch for 2.8.3, and as soon as 2.8.3 is released, remove the full paths again and enable the new CMP0017 instead (prefer CMAKE_ROOT when include()d from CMAKE_ROOT) and then see what happens during the whole 2.8.4 cycle. I think this (CMP0017) is necessary, because otherwise we can only hope nothing breaks with future releases (independent from FPHSA). Alex _______________________________________________ cmake-developers mailing list cmake-developers@cmake.org http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
