On 11/8/2010 3:30 PM, Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
Am Montag, 8. November 2010 schrieb Bill Hoffman:
On 11/8/2010 1:55 PM, Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
Am Montag, 8. November 2010 schrieb David Cole:
Hi Rolf,
Can you update to a CMake based on 'next' and try the commit I made this
morning on a QNX machine? (based on your patch, thank you for that...)
Still needs some tweak, as the output is:
getconf: Can't find _NPROCESSORS_ONLN
ProcessorCount: using getconf '/usr/bin/getconf'
ProcessorCount: using pidin '/bin/pidin'
processor_count='1'
Patch attached.
Eike
I wonder if we could create a test for this that called the
SystemInformation class and compared its results with this script. I
bet it would fix bugs in both the script and SystemInformation.
It would show up for sure places where at one place this is divided into
physical and logical cores and just "cpus" on the other hand.
On my machine I get this:
CMake.ProcessorCount
180: ProcessorCount: using environment variable
180: processor_count='4'
kwsys.testSystemInformation
11: GetNumberOfLogicalCPU: 1
11: GetNumberOfPhysicalCPU: 4
So, if we had a test that just ran:
kwsys.testSystemInformation
And pulled out the GetNumberOfPhysicalCPU value and did a compare, they
"should" be consistent. If they are not, then one of them will need
fixing...
-Bill
_______________________________________________
cmake-developers mailing list
cmake-developers@cmake.org
http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
