Alexander Neundorf wrote: > On Thursday 15 December 2011, Stephen Kelly wrote: >> Alexander Neundorf wrote: >> >> And, again a question regarding wording, currently the warnings >> >> generated by automoc say "Better <do this and that> for a more robust >> >> build." I'd like to have a better way to express it. >> >> "Use <this and that> for STRICT mode compatibility." ? >> >> or "for qmake compatibility" ? >> >> Better ideas ? >> > >> > I pushed it as branch AutomocFineTuning to stage. >> > The variable is now CMAKE_AUTOMOC_RELAXED_MODE . >> > >> > If that's fine with everybody, I'll merge it into next in the next >> > days. This should still go into 2.8.7. >> >> I applied the attached patch and kdelibs build fails using the >> AutomocFineTuning branch (as expected). > > You mean setting CMAKE_AUTOMOC_RELAXED_MODE to TRUE, right ? > Yes, that's expected.
I mean not setting it at all and letting it take its default value of True. > >> Uncommenting the line to invert the relaxed mode makes it build again. >> I'm fine with the change. >> >> However, the warnings/errors output by cmake don't include a reference to >> CMAKE_AUTOMOC_RELAXED_MODE (as that is not referenced in all >> error/warning cases). > > Do you have commit e474dcb23197489640456b4 already ? > http://cmake.org/gitweb?p=stage/cmake.git;a=commit;h=e474dcb23197489640456b46862a5aa7019834a5 > > I committed this Wednesday evening and though I had inserted it in all > places where it makes sense. Yes, I have this commit already. It might make sense to put the message in the other places. Thanks, Steve. -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
