Am Dienstag, 5. Juni 2012 um 15:35:15, schrieb Brad King <brad.k...@kitware.com>
> On 06/05/2012 01:19 PM, Brad King wrote:
> > On 06/05/2012 08:57 AM, Kornel Benko wrote:
> >>> The builtin cmlibarchive in CMake 2.8.8 is libarchive 3.0.2, from svn
> >>> rev 4051, now Git commit 28267d8f:
> >>  
> >> On ubuntu 12.04 it is package libarchive12, version 3.0.3-6ubuntu1.
> > 
> > Can you provide a simple script that reproduces a "bad" tarball
> > using "cmake -E tar" when CMake is built against that libarchive,
> > and a test to know if it is "bad"?  If I can reproduce it I can
> > bisect libarchive history.  I don't have Ubuntu 12.04 but I do
> > have dpkg.
> 
> I'd still like a test case so I can reproduce the problem locally.
> However, there were very few changes between the two versions of
> libarchive, at least upstream:
> 
>  $ git rev-list --count 28267d8..v3.0.3
>  18
> 
> The only one that looks even remotely like it could affect the
> pax output is this:
> 
>  https://github.com/libarchive/libarchive/commit/bc523371
> 
> -Brad

Maybe this version (3.0.2) is "erroneous" too. The last working version on 
ubuntu 11.10 was libarchive1_2.8.4-1ubuntu0.11.10.1_amd64.deb

        Kornel

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

--

Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: 
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers

Reply via email to