Clinton Stimpson wrote: > > On Aug 11, 2012, at 10:36 AM, Alexander Neundorf wrote: > >> On Friday 10 August 2012, Stephen Kelly wrote: >> > David Cole wrote: >> > > I assume it's the "qt4_use_modules" branch on the stage? >> > >> > Yes, sorry, I should have pointed that out. >> What was the plan with the more generic target_use_package() or how it >> was named ? This would do something similar, right ?
target_use_targets() in the latest proposal. > I was wondering the same. And how close are we to having the more generic > one working? So far Brad decided on the declarative syntax he wanted and implemented it in a private branch. I'm sure there will be progress during cmake 2.8.10, but it will not be finished by then. There will probably only be me working on it (though parts of it can be parallelized). The existing cmake code has to be refactored, the new features have to be designed (this part has been discussed already) and implemented, unit tested, documented, and maybe used in a few cmake modules. There is a lot to do, and I don't think we can predict the release it will all work in yet. Even then, it will only work with QT_USE_IMPORTED_TARGETS. qt4_use_modules also works without it. Thanks, Steve. -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
