David Cole wrote: > I don't like it. Existing tests that run and return, for example, a number > of errors that occurred, will magically appear as "not run" when that > number just so happens to be 77. > > If there are enough people who think this is "simple and works" and are not > concerned about the accidental matching of an intentional return value of > 77 that does NOT mean "not run" ... then I will relent and say, so be it, > and allow it in. > > But only if there are some people who speak up here or add notes to the bug. > > It just seems wrong to me to treat 77 as some special number here.
I would still go and make that a target property where you can set the return code where something is considered skipped. The only question is: how to name the property? Eike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
