Eric Noulard wrote:
> 2012/9/27 David Cole <david.c...@kitware.com>:
> > Hmmmm. Good idea.
> >
> > Should we add a new command for this? Or should it be a sub-command of
> > "string(" like RANDOM is?
> >
> > And... while we're at it, I've always thought we should add the
> > ability to get the creation/modified/access times from a file via the
> > CMake file command. If we allow getting the "current" time, we should
> > leverage some of the same transformation-to-string code in the file
> > command to get the various times associated with a file.
> >
> > What do other devs here think:
> > New command or string sub-command for this functionality?
>
> string sub-command for me, and agreed with Brad as well
> for the "namespace" thing.
>
> agreed with file(...) extension as well.
>
> that said isn't the "TIMESTAMP" misleading?
> shouldn't it be called "DATE" instead?I would second that. Eike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
