On 11/29/2012 04:35 PM, Stephen Kelly wrote: > I've pushed add-INTERFACE_LINK_LIBRARIES-property to my gitorious clone. Is > that what you meant?
I linked the exact commit I meant in 'next'. I'll look at this one now. > Is IMPORTED_LINK_DEPENDENT_LIBRARIES different from the others? It doesn't > have INTERFACE in the name. I haven't used it before either, but from the > documentation, it looks like it should be automatically populated by > target_link_libraries(foo LINK_PRIVATE bar) and similar? It's used to generate -Wl,-rpath-link (or platform equivalent) options when linking consumers of a library target. It needs to be populated with whatever dependencies are linked by the original shared library but are not in its link interface. That distinction is per-config and is now harder to compute. BTW, have you thought through how CMP0019 will deal with static libraries? Their IMPORTED_LINK_INTERFACE_LIBRARIES is always the "link implementation" as specified by tll(), but it is not maintained directly in the original LINK_INTERFACE_LIBRARIES property. > I've also pushed a docs commit to my gitorious clone. Please let me know if > I can push-merge-rewrite-push-merge that branch. Then I'll rebase the other > two topics too. Feel free to rewrite the staged topics as much as you want to keep things tested as they evolve from this discussion. Thanks, -Brad -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
