Brad King wrote:
> On 12/18/2012 11:49 AM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
>> Brad King wrote:
>>> The cmPropertyMap/cmProperty infrastructure could potentially store
>>> structures with the string values plus meta-data instead of just the
>>> strings as now.
>>
>> That sounds more complex to me. Would the possible meta-data be defined
>> as a c++ struct? What would it contain?
>
> Perhaps something like
>
> + struct IncludeDirectoriesEntry {
> +
> IncludeDirectoriesEntry(cmsys::auto_ptr<cmCompiledGeneratorExpression>
> cge)
> + : ge(cge)
> + {}
> + const cmsys::auto_ptr<cmCompiledGeneratorExpression> ge;
> + };
> + std::vector<IncludeDirectoriesEntry*> IncludeDirectoriesEntries;
>
> ? If the cmProperty API were virtual then a property definition could
> specify the subclass used to represent the property. One of the options
> could be a vector of generator expressions.
Can you think of what another option might be? Otherwise it's hard to
generalize the interface.
Thanks,
Steve.
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
