Am , schrieb Brad King:
On 01/08/2013 01:43 PM, Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
I have not submitted it to the next branch because I
assume this is another Kitware magic upstream tree:
It is.
diff --git a/Utilities/KWIML/ABI.h.in b/Utilities/KWIML/ABI.h.in
index 7f4772a..a336a80 100644
--- a/Utilities/KWIML/ABI.h.in
+++ b/Utilities/KWIML/ABI.h.in
@@ -255,6 +255,8 @@ suppression macro @KWIML@_ABI_NO_VERIFY was
defined.
# endif
# elif defined(__hpux) && !defined(__GNUC__) /* Old HP: no
__HP_cc/__HP_aCC above */
# define @KWIML@_ABI_SIZEOF_LONG_LONG 8
+# elif defined(__GNUC__)
+# define @KWIML@_ABI_SIZEOF_LONG_LONG 8
How about
+# elif defined(__GNUC__) && __GNUC__ == 2
+# define @KWIML@_ABI_SIZEOF_LONG_LONG 8
?
I don't know when this SIZEOF_LONG_LONG was introduced. If it is
present it is used before anyway. I just fear there are early 3.x
version that have the same problem. And I don't think it would hurt for
other cases, would it?
Eike
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
