David Cole wrote: > If you do re-use target_link_libraries for your glorious "one command to > rule them all," just be aware that you are invalidating 12+ years worth of > everything ever written about it on the web, and the collective experience > of thousands of CMake users around the world. > > That is my objection to re-purposing the name target_link_libraries, not > that you'd be doing more than linking. I don't think it's worth the > confusion that might come after this. >
Thanks for clarifying. :) I didn't mean to mis-characterize the objection. What I wrote was my understanding of Alex' objection and the assumption that yours was the same or very similar. Thanks, Steve -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
