On 02/11/2013 01:15 PM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
> the tll is always to append no matter the order of it relative to other calls:
[snip]
> That's really just a documentation concern.

Yes.

>> This approach will drop all the complex generator expressions from
>> the interfaces altogether.
> 
> Yes, we won't even need to know at export-time, because the generator 
> expressions will have been already evaluated. 

Yes.

> So, I think this is a good idea. I can work on it after minor-fixes is 
> merged probably. The only commit in there that is not needed is the one 
> changing LINKED. You can rebase that away or create another branch and 
> cherry-pick the following two commits or whatever other git incantation you 
> wish. They've all already been through the dashboard anyway.

Great, thanks.

I've merged minor-fixes to master as-is.  There is already $<LINKED>
history in master so it won't hurt.  There is now lots of history in
master for interface property approaches we're about to drop, but I
think that is fine because it records the progress of our thinking.

Please try to track down and remove any extra pieces like $<LINKED>
and <package>_NO_INTERFACES that we added in an attempt to deal with
the previous approach's problems.

Thanks,
-Brad
--

Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: 
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers

Reply via email to