On 02/18/2013 01:32 PM, Alexander Neundorf wrote: > On Monday 18 February 2013, Brad King wrote: >> On 02/18/2013 12:33 PM, Alexander Neundorf wrote: >>> Or do we allow "broken" targets to exist (but not to be used) >> >> Yes, this should be allowed IMO. The target import files are >> effectively declarative and evaluation of dependencies should >> be lazy. >> >> It wasn't that long ago that we started supporting dependent >> exports, so there could be plenty of packages that do not >> modularize their target exports even if they provide COMPONENTS. >> ITK is one. > > Ok, so even without warning ?
Yes, please. Thanks, -Brad -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
