Brad King wrote: >> I believe >> >> tll(tgt LINK_PRIVATE a LINK_PUBLIC b LINK_PRIVATE c) >> >> is valid today. I can't think of a reason to want that > > We considered such cases way back when first discussing that interface. > The use case is that there is an ordered implementation dependency on > "a;b;c" but only "b" should be in the link interface.
True. Added a unit test and pushed again to my clone. I'll wait until INTERFACE_LINK_LIBRARIES-prop is in master before merging it to next. Thanks, Steve. -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
